On Wednesday 17th June, 2020, Julie Pardy, Director of Regulation & Market Engagement (Worksmart) joined Employment Partners Marian Bloodworth and David Williams from Kemp Little LLP for an in-depth look at the current HR implications for firms around Covid-19 and the on-going requirements of the SM&CR regime.
The team at Worksmart are delighted to announce that we have won in four categories at the 2020 ACQ5 Global Awards.
On a very hot and sunny Tuesday in June, I was delighted to be invited to talk to Investment Association members on the topic of SM&CR. Joining a line-up that included David Blunt, Head of Conduct Specialists at the FCA, Angela Hayes from TLT, Natasha Cork from HSBC Asset Management and Sarah Thwaites, Senior Policy Adviser at The IA. The afternoon was given over to discussing regulatory expectations around SM&CR and practical experience of the dual regulated regime in Banking.
On Thursday 4th June, 2020, Julie Pardy, Director of Regulation & Market Engagement (Worksmart) joined the London Institute of Banking and Finance (LIBF) to discuss the implementation of SM&CR for solo regulated firms, particularly the challenges and priorities for those teams responsible for implementation.
On Thursday 28th May 2020, Philip Allen (Innovate Learn), Adrian Harvey (CEO, Elephants don’t forget) and Julie Pardy (Worksmart) hosted an interactive webinar; Covid-19 proves to be the SM&CRlitmus test. Over 100 delegates joined us and listened intently to the discussions which centred around six key SM&CR related issues that are currently affecting regulated firms:
The world of work has changed beyond recognition for most of us over the last few months. And when PIMFA approached us here at Worksmart to ask whether we wanted to be part of their first ever 2 day Virtual Conference and Exhibition, with plans for an exclusively digital learning experience to cover a multitude of issues to help firms thrive in these extraordinary times, I thought... what have we got to lose...
In the sixth of our series of guest blogs on key issues for complaints handling, Sarah Lawrence (Access preceding blog here...), former Technical Manager at Financial Ombudsman Service looks at how firms can work to avoid referrals to her former employer
Although we're well into 2020 and Covid-19 has ensured the world is a very different place to when the plan from the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) was published earlier in the year, (read the full report), the report makes for interesting reading despite the current priority of maintaining service levels through the disruption caused by the pandemic, (read the FCA's recent guidance).
Flexibility is key
Life is very different now from what it was just a few weeks ago. Businesses and their staff are facing great uncertainty, however one thing that is certain, is that as customers come to terms with the new normal, there will be rising levels of concern with regards to the provision of products and services from financial services providers. This will give rise to a range of different questions and potential complaints. The UK are facing this challenge at a time of heightened emotions on all sides, where everyone is potentially vulnerable, not just customers, but also your staff and your business.
In the fifth of our series of guest blogs on key issues for complaints handling, Sarah Lawrence (access the preceding blog here...), former Technical Manager at Financial Ombudsman Service looks at the importance of consistency in complaints handling
The DISP rules don’t say it in so many words, but its rules cover the need to spot and resolve habitual issues before they become complaints, as well as rules about learning lessons from past experience. This all points to one thing - consistency.
In the fourth of our series of guest blogs on key issues for complaints handling, Sarah Lawrence (access the preceding blog here...), former Technical Manager at Financial Ombudsman Service asks if companies are really catching all complaints and submitting them to Root Cause Analysis
It’s become something of a mantra wherever we go, businesses saying a lot about learning from complaints. We know it’s an expectation handed down from the regulator and the Ombudsman Service, and it gets trotted out, so that we can all say we’ve done our bit. Unfortunately, however, the reality is somewhat different, and it reflects in the bitty, piecemeal nature of dealing with complaints from the very start to the potential end after the Ombudsman has made the final decision.